ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 07.03.2019 RO

Judgment Abdullayev v. Azerbaijan - Refusal to examine video evidence of fight in parliament violated Article 6

HOTĂRÂRE
07.03.2019
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Abdullayev v. Azerbaijan - Refusal to examine video evidence of fight in parliament violated Article 6 (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2024-12-20
0,89
SADIGOV v. AZERBAIJAN
19 January 2023; and Abdullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 6005/08, §§ 58-63, 7 March 2019)? In particular: (a) was the applicant afforded an adequate opportunity to challenge the authenticity of the evidence against him, to oppose its use and to a
CtEDO 2020-01-30
0,89
CASE OF YAGUBLU AND AHADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of
CtEDO 2020-02-13
0,89
Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of
CtEDO 2015-10-15
0,89
Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right
CtEDO 2020-05-28
0,89
Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f
Sursă