ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 28.03.2019 RO

Decision Eiseman-Renyard v. the United Kingdom - complaints about preventive detention during 2011 royal wedding inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
28.03.2019
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Decision Eiseman-Renyard v. the United Kingdom - complaints about preventive detention during 2011 royal wedding inadmissible (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-03-05
0,89
EISEMAN-RENYARD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 57884/17 Hannah EISEMAN-RENYARD against the United Kingdom and 7 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5 March 2019 as a Committee compos
CtEDO 2005-05-19
0,88
GRANT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Declares inadmissible the applicant's complaints concerning discrimination in the enjoyment of her right to private life and concerning the la
CtEDO 2017-09-12
0,88
AUSTIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Aarhus Convention and EU Directive (see paragraph 16 above). While in certain cases applicants might be able to demonstrate good reasons for only raising their Convention complaints at such a late stage of proceedings, in the present case t
CtEDO 2012-05-22
0,88
PATERSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
tinguishable from that considered and rejected by it in Judge v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 35863/10, 8 February 2011. Accordingly, this part of the application must be rejected as manifestly ill founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and
CtEDO 2021-03-23
0,87
KNIGHTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
§ 81, ECHR 2002 ‐ IV). No violation of Article 5 § 1 is disclosed and the complaint must be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible.
Sursă