Decision Szalontay v. Hungary - inadmissible as applicant failed to exhaust domestic remedies

CtEDO 2019-03-12 0,92

ing the applicant from having to lodge such complaints in the present case. The Court also points out that it is ready to change its approach as to the potential effectiveness of the remedies in question should the practice of the domestic

CtEDO 2019-10-01 0,92

Law of Hungary (see Szalontay v. Hungary (dec.), no. 71327/13, §§ 29-41, 12 March 2019). 12. The present case pertains to the applicant’s grievance concerning fair trial – a right enshrined in Article 6 of the Convention and Articles XXIV a

CtEDO 2013-10-08 0,91

Béla Szabó v. Hungary, no. 37470/06, § 16, 9 December 2008). However, the applicant has not availed himself of this legal avenue. It follows that the application must be declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, within

CtEDO 2019-11-12 0,90

8 of the Convention and Articles VI, XXIV and XXVIII of the Fundamental Law of Hungary (see paragraph 7 above). 14. It follows that the constitutional complaint was an effective remedy to exhaust in the circumstances. 15. Since the applican

CtEDO 2019-10-01 0,90

exhausted for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention in situations where the application concerns Convention rights equally protected by the Fundamental Law of Hungary (see Szalontay v. Hungary (dec.), no. 71327/13, §§ 29-41, 12 M