ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 11.04.2019 RO

Judgment Harisch v. Germany - Federal Court of Justice's refusal to refer a case to the CJEU not in breach of the Convention

HOTĂRÂRE
11.04.2019
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Harisch v. Germany - Federal Court of Justice's refusal to refer a case to the CJEU not in breach of the Convention (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-02-06
0,90
HARISCH v. GERMANY
Communicated on 6 February 2017 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 50053/16 Klaus HARISCH against Germany lodged on 19 August 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil proceedings for damages, during which the applicant requ
CtEDO 2022-09-01
0,88
GONDERT v. GERMANY
Published on 19 September 2022 THIRD SECTION Application no. 34701/21 Heinz-Günter GONDERT against Germany lodged on 2 July 2021 communicated on 1 September 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil proceedings where th
CtEDO 2019-06-25
0,88
BLEY v. GERMANY
ach of EU law. 33. Even assuming that the applicant’s reliance on his right to property (as guaranteed under the Basic Law) could have triggered the domestic courts, in the event that they found the human-rights guarantees under the domesti
CtEDO 2021-03-15
0,88
VRACKO v. AUSTRIA and 1 other application
U render the proceedings unfair, in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Harisch v. Germany, no. 50053/16, §§ 33-36, 11 April 2019)? 2. Did the Administrative Court’s reasoning of its decisions of 22 October 2018 and of 20 Sept
CtEDO 2022-10-18
0,88
MS BET SPORTWETTEN GMBH & CO. KG v. AUSTRIA
Belgium (nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, §§ 54‐62, 20 September 2011), Harisch v. Germany (no. 50053/16, §§ 33-36, 11 April 2019) and Sanofi Pasteur v. France (no. 25137/16, §§ 68-70, 13 February 2020). 7. In accordance with these principles, th
Sursă