CtEDO 28.05.2019 RO

Judgment Liblik and Others v. Estonia - Trial was within a reasonable time but secret surveillance authorisations were not duly reasoned

HOTĂRÂRE

28.05.2019

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Liblik and Others v. Estonia - Trial was within a reasonable time but secret surveillance authorisations were not duly reasoned (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2019-11-19

0,90

HAMITSKI v. ESTONIA and 1 other application

of lawfulness, notably the so ‐ called “ ultima-ratio ” review of secret surveillance activities. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the interference with the applicants’ rights under Article 8 of the Convention in accordance with the law in so fa

CtEDO 2017-09-13

0,90

LIBLIK v. ESTONIA and 5 other applications

courts’ decisions did not comply with those requirements. However, the lack of reasoning did not amount to a lack of authorisation. This was so because the investigating authority was not competent to assess the adequacy of reasoning. It ha

CtEDO 2024-09-17

0,88

OOLO AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA

and P., and even if company W.’s insolvency contributed to company P. becoming insolvent (owing to the links between the two companies, as pointed out by the applicants), the Court is not convinced by the applicants’ assertion that the two

CtEDO 2019-10-02

0,88

BLAGAJAC v. CROATIA

-86, 4 December 2014)? (b) Were the principles of adversarial proceedings and the equality of arms respected with regard to the non-disclosure of the case file on the secret surveillance measures to the defence (cf. Matanović v. Croatia, no

CtEDO 2021-04-14

0,88

CASE OF LIBLIK AND OTHERS AGAINST ESTONIA

Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)58 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Liblik and Others against Estonia (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 April 2021 at the 1401 st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applica

Sursă