CtEDO 15.05.2025 Auto

CASE OF SEKSIMP GROUP SRL v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

RESPONDENT
MDA
HOTĂRÂRE
15.05.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary damage - reserved (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF SEKSIMP GROUP SRL v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 34) Aplicații individuale;(Art. 34) Victime;Nici o încălcare a articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procedura civilă;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă;Procedură inversă);Încălcarea articolului 6 - Dreptul la un proces echitabil (art. 6 - Procesul civil;art. 6-1 - Audiere echitabilă);Încălcarea articolului 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Protecţia proprietăţilor (art. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Obligaţii pozitive; art. 1 alin. 1 din Protocolul nr. 1 - Distracţie paşnică a bunurilor); leziuni pecuniare - rezervate (art. 41 - Leziuni pecuniare;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-05-15
0,96
AFFAIRE SEKSIMP GROUP SRL c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
Exception préliminaire rejetée (Art. 34) Requêtes individuelles;(Art. 34) Victime;Non-violation de l'article 6 - Droit à un procès équitable (Article 6 - Procédure civile;Article 6-1 - Procès équitable;Procédure contradictoire);Violation de
CtEDO 2019-02-12
0,95
CASE OF CRISTEA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 -
CtEDO 2022-05-03
0,93
SEKSIMP GROUP SRL v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
between the alleged failure to execute the tenancy contract and the claimed damage, which was speculative and disproportionate. The appeals were dismissed as ill ‐ founded in 2012. The applicant company complains of a violation of its right
CtEDO 2025-02-27
0,93
CASE OF I.C. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of A
CtEDO 2022-11-22
0,93
CASE OF G.M. AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Viol
Sursă