Judgment Cirstea v. Romania - insufficent reasons for placement in pre-trial detention

CtEDO 2019-02-12 0,89

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 -

CtEDO 2019-06-25 0,89

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Rat

CtEDO 2020-05-28 0,89

Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a f

CtEDO 2018-12-18 0,89

Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fa

CtEDO 2020-01-06 0,88

April 2018 the national judicial authorities ordered and then periodically extended the applicant’s pre-trial detention in connection with the criminal proceedings instituted against him on drug related charges, on the basis of the risk of