Judgment Russ v. Germany - Insufficient reasons f… · CtEDO 2025

CtEDO 2025-05-20

0,89

CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY - [German Translation] by the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.

CtEDO 2025-05-20

0,88

CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.

CtEDO 2025-05-20

0,88

CASE OF RUSS v. GERMANY - [Turkish Translation] summary by Okan Tașdelen

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art.

CtEDO 2017-07-12

0,88

ROSLOVTSEV v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

tions. – What is the legitimate aim of prohibiting the use of masks or other accessories covering the face in the case of a solo demonstration? Were the interruption of the applicant’s solo demonstrations, his arrest and conviction for the

CtEDO 2021-04-15

0,87

MONAKHOV v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications

October 2016) and 31947/17, what was the legitimate aim of prohibiting the use of masks or other items covering the face in the case of a solo demonstration? When convicting the applicants for wearing masks, did the domestic courts assess w

Judgment Russ v. Germany - Insufficient reasons for criminal conviction for wearing a plastic visor during a demonstration

Grupate prin similitudine semantică