ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 17.09.2019 RO

Judgment Iovcev and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia - Romanian/Moldovan-speaking schools in Transdniestria Region

HOTĂRÂRE
17.09.2019
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Iovcev and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia - Romanian/Moldovan-speaking schools in Transdniestria Region (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-06-18
0,89
CASE OF SOBCO AND GHENT v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention. A. The parties’ submissions 12. The applicants and the Moldovan Government submitted that both respondent Governments had jurisdiction. 13. For their part, the Russian Government argued that the a
CtEDO 2017-05-30
0,89
CASE OF SOYMA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 11138/10, §§ 61-77, ECHR 2016). THE LAW I. JURISDICTION 15. The Court must first determine whether the applicant falls within the jurisdiction of the respondent States for the purposes of the matters complained
CtEDO 2017-05-30
0,88
CASE OF APCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degradin
CtEDO 2014-03-06
0,88
CASES OF ILAȘCU AND OTHERS AND IVANTOC AND OTHERS AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)37 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Two cases against the Republic of Moldova and the Russian Federation Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 48787/99 ILAŞCU AND OTHERS
CtEDO 2021-06-15
0,88
CASE OF TOȚCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
diction taken by the Court in the cases of Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia ([GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004 ‐ VII), Ivanţoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia (no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011), and Catan and Others (cited above) was wron
Sursă