Decision Ilie v. Romania - no objective reason to doubt judges' impartiality in land dispute case

CtEDO 2019-12-17 0,89

that the applicant did not put forth any evidence that would suggest that the interpretation given by the domestic courts to the relevant legal provisions concerning impartiality of judges had amounted to an arbitrary or unreasonable applic

CtEDO 2019-09-03 0,89

by the lower court, the court held that the judicial proceedings involving the parties’ ancestors to which the applicant had referred had not concerned the same parties, object and circumstances. In particular, while the case before the cou

CtEDO 2025-10-07 0,88

. Portugal ([GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, §§ 144-50, 6 November 2018) and also in Alexandru Marian Iancu v. Romania (no. 60858/15, §§ 57-63, 4 February 2020). The Court had also held that the mere fact that the trial judge had made prev

CtEDO 2019-12-17 0,88

However, the money had not been paid during the collective enforcement proceedings and had not been passed on to the bank. Therefore, the cancellation of the mortgages concerning the applicants’ respective houses and land had not been justi

CtEDO 2024-05-17 0,88

the applicants’ case at the first instance level, judge I.B. had asked to withdraw from the case on the ground that a reasonable suspicion of lack of objective impartiality might arise due to the fact that he was a member of the Electoral B