CtEDO 05.12.2019 RO

Judgment Makeyan and Others v. Armenia - Makeyan v. Armenia - use of retracted pre-trial statements for convictions

HOTĂRÂRE
05.12.2019
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Makeyan and Others v. Armenia - Makeyan v. Armenia - use of retracted pre-trial statements for convictions (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2012-06-05
0,90
MAKEYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
THIRD SECTION Application no. 46435/09 Petros MAKEYAN and others against Armenia lodged on 26 August 2009 QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the use by the Shirak Regional Court of the pre-trial witness statements of witnesses K.H., L.M., S.V., L.
CtEDO 2019-12-05
0,89
CASE OF MAKEYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
who had not attended the trial, submitted to the Court where he stated that the investigator had told him that it would be better for him not to come to the court and give evidence in order to avoid problems. In any event, the applications
CtEDO 2012-06-05
0,88
MAKEYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
§ 1 and 3 (d), Articles 8, 10, 11, 13 and 14 of the Convention and Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. 40. Having regard to all the material in its possession, and in so far as these complaints fall within its competence, the Court finds that they
CtEDO 2021-03-09
0,88
SAHAKYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
(see Karen Poghosyan v. Armenia, no. 62356/09, §§ 44 and 46, 31 March 2016)? In that connection, was the quashing of the final judgment in the applicants’ case justified by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character, such as co
CtEDO 2022-02-22
0,88
CASE OF SHIRKHANYAN v. ARMENIA - [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degradin
Sursă