ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 12.12.2019 RO

Decision Man and Others v. Romania - complaints brought by journalist accused of blackmailling network rejected as inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
12.12.2019
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Decision Man and Others v. Romania - complaints brought by journalist accused of blackmailling network rejected as inadmissible (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2019-12-17
0,89
BRĂDIȚEANU v. ROMANIA
that the applicant did not put forth any evidence that would suggest that the interpretation given by the domestic courts to the relevant legal provisions concerning impartiality of judges had amounted to an arbitrary or unreasonable applic
CtEDO 2020-10-20
0,89
MARIAN v. ROMANIA
that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 20. Accordingly the Court considers that the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accord
CtEDO 2019-12-17
0,88
CRAIOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
judges C.B.N., A.R.S. and M.O.G. had been examined by the same panel of judges both during the proceedings concluded by the final judgment of 6 March 2012 and those concluded by the final judgment of 20 March 2013, even though the grounds s
CtEDO 2019-01-08
0,88
ROMILA v. ROMANIA
27/02, 25 January 2007) found that the rules concerning court fees, which were applicable in the present case, complied with the Convention requirements (CM/ResDH(2011)24). 38. In the light of the above findings, the Court concludes that th
CtEDO 2019-01-08
0,88
BUȘU v. ROMANIA
violation of his rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Lukacs v. Romania (dec.), no. 26577/08, § 29, 10 April 2018). 16. Therefore, the application must be rejected in accordance with Article 35
Sursă