ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 17.12.2019 RO

Judgment Khizanishvili and Kandelaki v. Georgia - inadequate compensation for illegally demolished building

HOTĂRÂRE
17.12.2019
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2019
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Khizanishvili and Kandelaki v. Georgia - inadequate compensation for illegally demolished building (CtEDO, 2019)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2017-09-20
0,91
KHIZANISHVILI AND KANDELAKI v. GEORGIA
noted that the City Court determined the “market value of the commercial premises in question”, but the appellate court determined the “value of the demolished commercial premises”. The applicants appealed against the Court of Appeal decisi
CtEDO 2025-09-23
0,88
CASE OF ISLAMZADE v. AZERBAIJAN
ed to the merits (see, for a similar approach, Khizanishvili and Kandelaki v. Georgia, no. 25601/12, § 44, 17 December 2019). 14. The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of
CtEDO 2023-12-14
0,88
CASE OF KHUNDADZEEBI v. GEORGIA
. 1 only in exceptional circumstances (see Paplauskienė v. Lithuania, no. 31102/06, § 49, 14 October 2014; see also Rysovskyy, cited above, § 71, and Belova v. Russia, no. 33955/08, § 37, 15 September 2020). 21. The foregoing considerations
CtEDO 2025-04-22
0,88
CASE OF SADIGOV v. AZERBAIJAN
, had constituted an appropriate and sufficient redress. The applicant could not therefore claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. The applicant argued that the compensation awarded by the local
CtEDO 2021-04-16
0,87
GENTILI v. ITALY
Published on 3 May 2021 FIRST SECTION Application no. 444/18 Giampaolo GENTILI and Elisabetta GENTILI against Italy lodged on 15 December 2017 communicated on 16 April 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the amount of compensa
Sursă