Judgment Alexandru-Marian Iancu v. Romania - allegations of bias against judge were not justified

CtEDO 2025-10-07 0,89

. Portugal ([GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, §§ 144-50, 6 November 2018) and also in Alexandru Marian Iancu v. Romania (no. 60858/15, §§ 57-63, 4 February 2020). The Court had also held that the mere fact that the trial judge had made prev

CtEDO 2019-12-17 0,89

that the applicant did not put forth any evidence that would suggest that the interpretation given by the domestic courts to the relevant legal provisions concerning impartiality of judges had amounted to an arbitrary or unreasonable applic

CtEDO 2025-12-02 0,89

and 2 others, §§ 144-50, 6 November 2018). 21. The Court observes at the outset that the applicant has not alleged that S.I.M. and M.I., who sat on the appeal bench, held any personal bias or animosity against him (contrast Kyprianou v. Cyp

CtEDO 2020-10-20 0,89

that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. 20. Accordingly the Court considers that the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accord

CtEDO 2021-09-28 0,88

the applicants ever raised this complaint before the domestic authorities. In any event, assuming that this issue had been raised by the applicants, the Court reiterates that it has previously examined similar complaints and found that the