CtEDO 03.03.2020 RO

Judgment Convertito and Others v. Romania - annulling university degrees issued to Italian students was not justified

HOTĂRÂRE
03.03.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză
Judgment Convertito and Others v. Romania - annulling university degrees issued to Italian students was not justified (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-07-21
0,88
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 -
CtEDO 2023-05-25
0,88
CASE OF DICU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
of the Court’s list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention and the judgment of 2 December 2021 in the case of Dicu and Others v. Romania should be revised as far as it concerns the application in question. FOR THESE RE
CtEDO 2022-12-01
0,88
CASE OF PĂDURARIU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
s list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention and the judgment of 13 January 2022 in the case of Pădurariu and Others v. Romania should be revised as far as it concerns the application in question. FOR THESE REASONS, T
CtEDO 2021-06-01
0,88
CASE OF ASSOCIATION ACCEPT AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discriminatio
CtEDO 2019-01-24
0,87
CASE OF CORDELLA AND OTHERS v. ITALY - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right
Sursă