Decision Graner v. France - consultation of certa… · CtEDO 2020

CtEDO 2003-02-04

0,88

DURINGER and OTHERS and GRUNGE v. FRANCE [Extracts]

doubt whatsoever that it constitutes an abuse of the right of application within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It follows that the applications lodged by Mr Gérard Duringer and Mr Forest Grunge must be declared inadmissib

CtEDO 2018-02-01

0,87

CASE OF M.A. v. FRANCE

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat

CtEDO 2018-02-01

0,87

M.A. v. France

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat

CtEDO 2018-02-01

0,87

CASE OF M.A. v. FRANCE - [Romanian Translation] legal summary by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Moldova

Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Algeria);Violat

CtEDO 2025-10-16

0,87

GRUNWALD c. FRANCE

. 34. Partant, la requête est manifestement mal fondée et elle doit être déclarée irrecevable, en application de l’article 35 §§ 3 a) et 4 de la Convention. Par ces motifs, la Cour, à l’unanimité, Déclare la requête irrecevable. Fait en fra

Decision Graner v. France - consultation of certain archives of the French President’s office on Rwanda: inadmissible

Grupate prin similitudine semantică