CtEDO 24.06.2025 Auto

CASE OF H.Q. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

RESPONDENT
HUN
HOTĂRÂRE
24.06.2025
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application;Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens - {general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Procedural aspect) (Serbia);Violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens - {general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF H.Q. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY (CtEDO, 2025)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 37) Strângerea cererilor-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Strângerea cererilor; (Art. 37-1-a) Absența intenției de a continua aplicarea;Violația articolului 4 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Interzicerea expulzării colective a extratereştrilor - {generale} (art. 4 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Interzicerea expulzării colective a extratereştrilor);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Expulsie) (aspectul procedural) (Serbia);Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+P4-4 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediare eficace) (art. 4 din Protocolul nr. 4 - Interzicerea expulzării colective a extratereştrilor - {generale};Prohibirea expulzării colective a extratereştrilor); Statul pârât să ia măsuri de caracter general (art. 46-2 - Măsuri generale); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacţie)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-06-24
1,00
H.Q. and Others v. Hungary
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application;Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collectiv
CtEDO 2021-07-08
0,95
CASE OF SHAHZAD v. HUNGARY
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohib
CtEDO 2021-07-08
0,95
Shahzad v. Hungary
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohib
CtEDO 2021-07-08
0,94
CASE OF SHAHZAD v. HUNGARY - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens - {general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Proh
CtEDO 2021-07-08
0,94
CASE OF SHAHZAD v. HUNGARY - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohib
Sursă