ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 23.07.2020 RO

Judgment Chong Coronado v. Andorra - obligation for people convicted in their absence to appear in person before being able to appeal

HOTĂRÂRE
23.07.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Chong Coronado v. Andorra - obligation for people convicted in their absence to appear in person before being able to appeal (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2020-05-25
0,87
QOSJA v. ALBANIA
39, 22 May 2018; and Cani v. Albania, no. 11006/06, § 63, 6 March 2012)? In particular: (a) Was the Supreme Court empowered to examine the applicant’s appeal on points of facts and law and make a fresh determination of his conviction in abs
CtEDO 2013-03-12
0,86
GOMEZ OLMEDA v. SPAIN
not held a public hearing at which the witnesses at the hearing at first instance had been heard in person and directly by the court and there were no legal grounds precluding the appearance of those witnesses before the court. Accordingly,
CtEDO 2022-02-07
0,86
BANAKOU v. GREECE
§ 13 ‐ 14, 31 October 2017)? 2. If so, have the domestic decisions violated the applicant’s right to be present at the appeal hearing and to defend herself in person within the meaning of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention? In parti
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,86
CASE OF Y.B. v. RUSSIA
no. 253 ‐ B, and Maširević v. Serbia, no. 30671/08, § 48, 11 February 2014). 42. As regards Russian national law (see paragraphs 25-28 above), the Court notes that it provides a defendant convicted in absentia with three avenues, as regards
CtEDO 2000-02-08
0,86
ELIAZER v. THE NETHERLANDS
adversarial proceedings and persons tried in proceedings in absentia. The Supreme Court noted that, according to Article 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Netherlands Antilles ( Wetboek van Strafvordering van de Nederlandse Antil
Sursă