Communication of Tuleya v. Poland - case concerning disciplinary proceedings against well-known judge

CtEDO 2020-09-01 0,90

The impugned proceedings cast doubt on the applicant’s professional competences as a judge as well as his objectivity and independence. The applicant further complains that the interference with his rights was not carried out “in accordance

CtEDO 2021-07-16 0,89

the Convention on account of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court’s decision of 18 November 2020 and on account of the alleged attacks on the applicant by the authorities and the media associated with them (see Denisov v. Ukraine (

CtEDO 2023-07-06 0,89

Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-

CtEDO 2023-07-06 0,88

Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-

CtEDO 2023-03-10 0,88

Published on 27 March 2023 FIRST SECTION Application no. 46788/21 Włodzimierz BRAZEWICZ against Poland lodged on 13 September 2021 communicated on 10 March 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the length of the disciplin