ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 13.10.2020 RO

Judgment Gafiuc v. Romania - withdrawal of accreditation to consult the Securitate archives: no violation of the Convention

HOTĂRÂRE
13.10.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Gafiuc v. Romania - withdrawal of accreditation to consult the Securitate archives: no violation of the Convention (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2018-11-15
0,88
MUSTAFA v. ROMANIA
fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto which require the continued examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out
CtEDO 2020-10-15
0,88
MAVRIANOPOL v. ROMANIA
applicants’ complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see Ana Ionescu and Others v. Romania, nos. 19788/03 and 18 others, §§ 15-16, 26 February 2019) and that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and it
CtEDO 2016-11-22
0,88
IACOBESCU v. ROMANIA
, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out
CtEDO 2021-11-09
0,88
SINCAR v. ROMANIA
fulness of his detention could be examined by the courts, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 36. However, in the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence,
CtEDO 2021-12-09
0,88
TACU v. ROMANIA
by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck
Sursă