ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 27.10.2020 RO

Judgment Kilicdaroglu v. Turkey - leader of main opposition party, violation of his freedom of expression

HOTĂRÂRE
27.10.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Kilicdaroglu v. Turkey - leader of main opposition party, violation of his freedom of expression (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-01-19
0,89
CASE OF MEHDİ TANRIKULU v. TURKEY (N° 2) - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent fleeing;Reasonably necessary to prevent offence);Violation of Artic
CtEDO 2021-01-19
0,88
CASE OF MEHDİ TANRIKULU v. TURKEY (N° 2)
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent fleeing;Reasonably necessary to prevent offence);Violation of Artic
CtEDO 2023-01-31
0,88
CASE OF ABDULLAH KILIÇ v. TÜRKİYE - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c
CtEDO 2022-01-25
0,88
CASE OF İLKER DENİZ YÜCEL v. TURKEY
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Law
CtEDO 2013-04-30
0,88
SİLGİR v. TURKEY
sentenced to imprisonment and an administrative fine on the grounds of his activities, which constituted a breach of his right to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Has there been an interference with
Sursă