ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 08.07.2025 RO

Judgment Selahattin Demirtas v. Türkiye (no. 4) - Several violations of the Convention due to the applicant's continued detention

HOTĂRÂRE
08.07.2025
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Selahattin Demirtas v. Türkiye (no. 4) - Several violations of the Convention due to the applicant's continued detention (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-07-08
0,91
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAȘ v. TÜRKİYE (No. 4) - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Pr
CtEDO 2025-03-06
0,90
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAȘ AGAINST TURKEY (No. 2) AND 1 OTHER CASE
a speedy decision on the lawfulness of detention on account of the use of stereotyped reasoning by the domestic court in denying access to the investigation file (violation of Article 5, paragraph 4); Recalling further the Court’s indicatio
CtEDO 2021-12-02
0,90
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAȘ AGAINST TURKEY (No. 2)
Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)428 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (No. 2) (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2021 at the 1419 th meeting of the Ministers' De
CtEDO 2024-08-27
0,90
ATALAY v. TÜRKİYE
purposes of Article 5 § 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no. 13237/17, § 139, 20 March 2018)? 2. Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective procedure by which he could challenge the lawfulness of his detentio
CtEDO 2024-11-29
0,90
KÖKÇÜ v. TÜRKİYE and 29 other applications
Article 5 of the Convention 1. (a) Did the applicants exhaust the remedies available in domestic law in relation to their complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention? To the extent that the applicants’ complaints did not relate solely
Sursă