CtEDO 16.12.2020 RO

The interim measure indicated in the case of Armenia v. Azerbaijan and Rule 39 proceedings with regard to alleged captives to remain in force

HOTĂRÂRE

16.12.2020

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

The interim measure indicated in the case of Armenia v. Azerbaijan and Rule 39 proceedings with regard to alleged captives to remain in force (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2019-02-27

0,89

CASE OF ARZUMANYAN AGAINST ARMENIA

on remand; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment is being examined within the framework of the Poghosyan case and that the closure of this case in no way

CtEDO 2024-06-13

0,88

CASE OF ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN AGAINST ARMENIA

during detention as well as the lack of effective remedies in this respect; DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case; CONCLUDES that the necessary individual measures have be

CtEDO 2020-03-05

0,88

CASE OF AYVAZYAN AGAINST ARMENIA

adopted to give effect to the judgment, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)90 ); Considering that the question of individual measures has therefore

CtEDO 2020-10-08

0,88

Jhangiryan v. Armenia

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 -

CtEDO 2020-10-08

0,88

CASE OF JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA – [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia

Sursă