ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 16.12.2020 RO

Grand Chamber Decision Slovenia v. Croatia - inter-State case inadmissible owing to organisation’s lack of non-governmental status

HOTĂRÂRE
16.12.2020
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2020
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Grand Chamber Decision Slovenia v. Croatia - inter-State case inadmissible owing to organisation’s lack of non-governmental status (CtEDO, 2020)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-01-11
0,89
B.G. v. CROATIA
ković v. Croatia, no. 21188/09, § 79, 12 April 2011). 18. It follows that this application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimou
CtEDO 2021-09-21
0,89
IGNJATIĆ v. CROATIA
a punishment ( jus puniendi ), nor can it conclude that the applicant suffered any disproportionate prejudice resulting from the duplication of proceedings, which formed a coherent and proportionate whole (see, Bajčić, cited above, § 46). 3
CtEDO 2018-06-12
0,89
STOJAKOVIĆ v. CROATIA
decisions in the applicant’s case are arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (compare Lukežić, cited above, § 56). 42. Against the above background, the Court finds that the applicant’s complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected
CtEDO 2021-09-28
0,88
PINTARIĆ v. CROATIA
nt did not put forward such a complaint in his constitutional complaint (see paragraph 13 above). 46. Accordingly, this complaint must be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. For th
CtEDO 2020-09-29
0,88
HORVATIN v. CROATIA
Court’s jurisdiction is determined by the Convention itself, in particular by its Article 32, and not by the parties’ submissions in a particular case. Accordingly, the Court, has to satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction in any case broug
Sursă