CtEDO 10.07.2025 RO

Judgment Tomenko v. Ukraine - Ending an MP’s mandate prematurely was unlawful and disproportionate, and placed political parties above the electorate

HOTĂRÂRE

10.07.2025

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Tomenko v. Ukraine - Ending an MP’s mandate prematurely was unlawful and disproportionate, and placed political parties above the electorate (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2023-06-08

0,91

TOMENKO v. UKRAINE

Published on 26 June 2023 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 79340/16 Mykola Volodymyrovych TOMENKO against Ukraine lodged on 13 December 2016 communicated on 8 June 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the early termination of the

CtEDO 2020-08-27

0,88

MARKOV v. UKRAINE

. COMPLAINT The applicant complains that the invalidation of election results in his constituency was arbitrary and unlawful. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a breach of the applicant’s rights under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1? In p

CtEDO 2024-11-22

0,87

CHALA v. UKRAINE and 7 other applications

ian 5. 46296/21 Lysenko v. Ukraine 06/09/2021 Volodymyr Vasylyovych LYSENKO 1956 Dmytrivka Ukrainian 6. 50426/21 Konyakin v. Ukraine 29/09/2021 Sergiy Mykhaylovych KONYAKIN 1962 Golovanivsk Ukrainian 7. 25838/23 Bets v. Ukraine 15/06/2023 O

CtEDO 2021-02-04

0,87

KOMTEKH-PLUS, PF NVP v. UKRAINE

(see paragraph 60 above) that the applicant company’s complaint that the Lviv Commercial Court of Appeal and the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine had exceeded their jurisdiction was manifestly ill-founded. In addition, there is nothing in

CtEDO 2025-10-13

0,87

PROSYANIK v. UKRAINE

(i) in particular, did the domestic courts provide sufficient reasons for their decisions and were their decisions “arbitrary” and/or “manifestly unreasonable” (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, §§ 61 ‐ 64, ECHR 2015; and Ra

Sursă