Judgment E.G. v. the Republic of Moldova - failure to enforce the sentence of a sexual offender

CtEDO 2021-04-13 0,90

M.G.C. v. Romania, no. 61495/11, § 59, 15 March 2016, and Z v. Bulgaria, no. 39257/17, § 67, 28 May 2020). 40. Implicit in this context is a requirement to act with reasonable promptness and expedition. A prompt response on the part of the

CtEDO 2022-12-14 0,89

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)398 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights N.O. and M.P. against the Republic of Moldova (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022 at the 1452 nd meeting of the Ministers’ D

CtEDO 2022-10-19 0,89

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)266 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Igor Pancenco against Republic of Moldova (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 October 2022 at the 1446 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputi

CtEDO 2021-11-23 0,88

35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Takes note of the terms of the respondent Government’s declaration under Article 6 of the Convention and of the modalities for ensuring compliance with the undertak

CtEDO 2022-02-22 0,88

A no. 91; A and B v. Croatia, no. 7144/15, 20 June 2019; and A.P. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 41086/12, 26 October 2021)? 2. Was the manner in which the Act on the Procedure in Juvenile Cases was applied in the present case by the domes