CtEDO 11.05.2021 Auto

CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA

RESPONDENT
BGR
HOTĂRÂRE
11.05.2021
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Final domestic decision;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA (CtEDO, 2021)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecție preliminară respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-b) Nu există dezavantaj semnificativ;Rezistare inadmisibilă (Art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Perioada de șase luni; (Art. 35-1) Decizia internă finală;Încălcarea articoluluiui 14+8 - Interzicerea discriminării (art. 14 - Discriminare) (art. 8 - Dreptul de a respecta viața privată și de familie;art. 8-1 - Respectul vieții familiale);Dăune pecuniare și morale - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dăune pecuniare;Dar satisfacție);Dăune morale - cerere respinsă (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Dar satisfacție)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-05-11
1,00
Yocheva and Ganeva v. Bulgaria
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Final domestic decision;Violation of
CtEDO 2021-05-11
0,99
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA - [Bulgarian Translation] by the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Final domestic decision;Violation of
CtEDO 2021-05-11
0,98
CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Final domestic decision;Violation of
CtEDO 2022-10-04
0,95
CASE OF PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of
CtEDO 2022-10-04
0,95
CASE OF PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA - [Bulgarian Translation] by the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of
Sursă