CtEDO 18.05.2021 RO

Judgment OOO Informatsionnoye Agentstvo Tambov-Inform v. Russia - Court encourages reform of electoral-campaign media regulations in the light of violation of applicant company’s rights

HOTĂRÂRE

18.05.2021

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment OOO Informatsionnoye Agentstvo Tambov-Inform v. Russia - Court encourages reform of electoral-campaign media regulations in the light of violation of applicant company’s rights (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2021-05-18

0,91

CASE OF OOO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO TAMBOV-INFORM v. RUSSIA

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart ideas;Freedom to impart information);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expr

CtEDO 2017-05-17

0,90

OOO TAMBOV-INFORM v. RUSSIA

Communicated on 17 May 2017 THIRD SECTION Application no. 43351/12 OOO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO TAMBOV-INFORM against Russia lodged on 21 June 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns imposition of fines between 720 and 1,

CtEDO 2021-05-18

0,90

AFFAIRE OOO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO TAMBOV-INFORM c. RUSSIE

Violation de l'article 10 - Liberté d'expression-{général} (Article 10-1 - Liberté d'expression;Liberté de communiquer des idées;Liberté de communiquer des informations);Violation de l'article 10 - Liberté d'expression-{général} (Article 10

CtEDO 2022-05-24

0,90

CASE OF ZAO INFORMATSIONNOYE AGENTSTVO ROSBALT v. RUSSIA

exceeded the margin of appreciation afforded to them and failed to demonstrate that there was a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the interference in question and the legitimate aim pursued (see, with further references, To

CtEDO 2017-08-30

0,89

SAMSONOV v. RUSSIA

te expression (compare Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, §§ 117-35, 21 February 2017; Ruling no. 4-P of 14 February 2013 by the Russian Constitutional Court (paragraph 2 of the operative part) about the distinction between campaigni

Sursă