CtEDO 10.06.2021 RO

Judgment Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) and Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union (NTF) v. Norway - Ruling of union boycott unlawful under EEA law did not violate Convention

HOTĂRÂRE

10.06.2021

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) and Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union (NTF) v. Norway - Ruling of union boycott unlawful under EEA law did not violate Convention (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2019-04-30

0,94

NORWEGIAN CONFEDERATION OF TRADE UNIONS (LO) AND NORWEGIAN TRANSPORT WORKERS’ UNION (NTF) v. NORWAY

Communicated on 30 April 2019 SECOND SECTION Application no. 45487/17 Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO) and Norwegian Transport Workers’ Union (NTF) against Norway lodged on 15 June 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application

CtEDO 2019-10-08

0,86

E.H. v. NORWAY

Communicated on 8 October 2019 SECOND SECTION Application no. 39717/19 E.H. against Norway lodged on 10 July 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns deprivation of the applicant’s parental responsibilities in respect of his

CtEDO 2007-06-14

0,86

TRAN v. NORWAY

fair balance was struck in this case in that the applicant’s expulsion and exclusion from Norway was proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and therefore necessary in a democratic society. It follows that the application is manifestly

CtEDO 2025-10-08

0,86

SVENSKA TRANSPORTARBETAREFÖRBUNDET v. SWEDEN

Published on 27 October 2025 FIRST SECTION Application no. 37028/23 SVENSKA TRANSPORTARBETAREFÖRBUNDET against Sweden lodged on 4 October 2023 communicated on 8 October 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the Swedish co

CtEDO 2016-01-26

0,86

NGUYEN v. NORWAY

period in question. 35. In the light of all of the above, the Court finds that the applicant’s temporary removal from Norway cannot be considered to be incompatible with Article 8 of the Convention. 36. It follows that the application is ma

Sursă