Grand Chamber judgment Kurt v. Austria -The Austrian authorities did not fail in their obligation un

CtEDO 2017-03-30

0,88

KURT v. AUSTRIA

their positive obligations to protect her and her children’s interests. It should have been obvious to the authorities that a significant risk of new acts of violence of E. existed because of his long history of violence against the applica

CtEDO 2021-07-20

0,88

CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -

CtEDO 2021-07-20

0,87

CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA

Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -

CtEDO 2021-07-20

0,87

CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA - [Croatian Translation] summary by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia

Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -

CtEDO 2021-07-20

0,87

CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA - [Ukrainian Translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -

Grand Chamber judgment Kurt v. Austria -The Austrian authorities did not fail in their obligation under the Convention to protect the lives of the applicant and her children

Grupate prin similitudine semantică