ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 29.06.2021 RO

Judgment Broda and Bojara v. Poland - Removal of the applicants from office did not respect their right of access to a court

HOTĂRÂRE
29.06.2021
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Broda and Bojara v. Poland - Removal of the applicants from office did not respect their right of access to a court (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-10-26
0,89
CASE OF K.P. v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice
Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1) Respect for human rights;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility
CtEDO 2022-04-07
0,89
HOŁDA v. POLAND
the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Cour
CtEDO 2022-04-07
0,88
BORDARYCKI v. POLAND
is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the li
CtEDO 2021-11-10
0,88
KORDZIŃSKI v. POLAND
a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the applicat
CtEDO 2021-11-10
0,88
GOLIASZ v. POLAND
of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. Both letters were returned with the information that the applicant was no longer in prison and that nobody had collected t
Sursă