Decision Matijašic v. Croatia - Penalty points and subsequent driving ban not double punishment

CtEDO 2021-06-08 0,91

which he has already been finally acquitted or convicted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of that State.” The parties’ submissions 18. The Government argued, firstly, that the driving ban imposed on the applicant did not meet

CtEDO 2021-09-21 0,89

a punishment ( jus puniendi ), nor can it conclude that the applicant suffered any disproportionate prejudice resulting from the duplication of proceedings, which formed a coherent and proportionate whole (see, Bajčić, cited above, § 46). 3

CtEDO 2017-04-04 0,89

Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to

CtEDO 2017-01-30 0,89

the High Minor Offences Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal as unfounded on the grounds that the application of the measure under section 286 (6) of the Road Traffic Safety Act was not a penalty imposed against the applicant but a measur

CtEDO 2022-06-10 0,89

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)123 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Two cases against Croatia (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 June 2022 at the 1436 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Application No