CtEDO 01.07.2021 RO

Decision El Kodwa Arafat v. France - application by widow and daughter of Yasser Arafat inadmissible

HOTĂRÂRE
01.07.2021
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Decision El Kodwa Arafat v. France - application by widow and daughter of Yasser Arafat inadmissible (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-06-22
0,88
BAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
, § 49, ECHR 2002 ‐ X). 47. Accordingly, the application is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inad
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,88
BAJER AND OTHERS v. POLAND
manifestly ill-founded in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application inadmissible. Done in English and notified in writing on 1 December 2022. Liv Tigerst
CtEDO 2021-05-27
0,88
BOSTOGHANASHVILI v. GEORGIA
-law. 42. It follows that this part of the application is also manifestly ill‐founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Declares the application i
CtEDO 2025-01-16
0,87
CASE OF A.C. v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1
CtEDO 2025-09-04
0,87
CASE OF E.A. AND ASSOCIATION EUROPÉENNE CONTRE LES VIOLENCES FAITES AUX FEMMES AU TRAVAIL v. FRANCE
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - R
Sursă