ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 20.07.2021 RO

Judgment Polat v. Austria - Post-mortem examination of baby’s body against mother’s will led to violations

HOTĂRÂRE
20.07.2021
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Polat v. Austria - Post-mortem examination of baby’s body against mother’s will led to violations (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,90
Polat v. Austria
Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,90
CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,90
CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA - [Croatian Translation] summary by the Office of the representative of the Republic of Croatia
Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -
CtEDO 2021-07-20
0,89
CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA
Violation of Article 8+9 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion;Article 9-1 -
CtEDO 2017-05-23
0,89
POLAT v. AUSTRIA
there been an interference with the applicant’s rights under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention in relation to the carrying-out of the post ‐ mortem on her son’s body against her will? If so, has the interference been in accordance with the la
Sursă