Judgment X. v. Poland - Discrimination in custody… · CtEDO 2021

CtEDO 2021-09-16

0,89

CASE OF X v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Ar

CtEDO 2022-02-17

0,89

CASE OF Y v. POLAND - [Polish Translation] by the Polish Ministry of Justice

Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;No violation of Article 8 - Right to

CtEDO 2021-09-16

0,88

CASE OF X v. POLAND - [Czech Translation] summary by the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Ar

CtEDO 2021-09-16

0,88

CASE OF X v. POLAND

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Ar

CtEDO 2019-02-26

0,88

X v. POLAND

’t want to be together. For the reasons indicated above, [the applicant] cannot be that parent,... because the other children are not with her.” This decision was communicated to the applicant on 6 October 2009. COMPLAINTS The applicant com

Judgment X. v. Poland - Discrimination in custody case based on mother’s relationship with another woman

Grupate prin similitudine semantică