CtEDO 12.10.2021 RO

Judgment R.D. and I.M.D. v. Romania - The applicants' confinement in a psychiatric hospital and their forced treatment breached the Convention

HOTĂRÂRE

12.10.2021

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment R.D. and I.M.D. v. Romania - The applicants' confinement in a psychiatric hospital and their forced treatment breached the Convention (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2023-03-20

0,90

A.S. v. ROMANIA

Was the applicant’s detention in the psychiatric ward duly justified for the purpose of Article 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention (see N. v. Romania, §§ 151 and 163, and Stanev, § 157, both cited above)? In particular, at the moment of his compul

CtEDO 2015-09-01

0,89

ROBU v. ROMANIA

Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant complains of poor medical treatment in prison and about the bad conditions of detention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Were the conditions of the applicant’s detention and medical care and treatment in p

CtEDO 2016-04-20

0,89

MIHAI v. ROMANIA

of the building. COMPLAINT Relying on Article 3 of the Convention the applicant complains about the inhuman and degrading treatment he was subjected to on account of his disability. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the applicant subjected to inh

CtEDO 2023-03-10

0,89

I.M. v. ROMANIA

been heard by the first instance court, that was dismissed as ill-founded by a final decision of 25 February 2022 of the Bucharest County Court. According to that decision, it was not necessary that the applicant be heard because the findin

CtEDO 2022-04-06

0,89

V.I. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

Was the applicant housed and treated in insalubrious conditions and subjected to various forms of violence or coercion, including from other residents of the psychiatric ward, in breach of Article 3 and/or 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis

Sursă