ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 16.09.2025 RO

Request for advisory opinion lodged by Ukraine's Supreme Court on whether a nun’s cell can qualify as her home

HOTĂRÂRE
16.09.2025
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2025
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Request for advisory opinion lodged by Ukraine's Supreme Court on whether a nun’s cell can qualify as her home (CtEDO, 2025)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2025-10-13
0,88
PROSYANIK v. UKRAINE
(i) in particular, did the domestic courts provide sufficient reasons for their decisions and were their decisions “arbitrary” and/or “manifestly unreasonable” (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, §§ 61 ‐ 64, ECHR 2015; and Ra
CtEDO 2020-01-27
0,88
NERIVNYA v. UKRAINE
courts comply with the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention in the course of the civil proceedings on determination of the child’s place of residence? In particular, did the courts provide relevant and sufficient reasons for their co
CtEDO 2025-02-11
0,88
MATUKHNO v. UKRAINE
regard to the nature and severity of the applicant’s health issues, was the detention itself compatible with his state of health (see, for example, Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, §§ 36-48, ECHR 2002-IX; Gülay Çetin v. Turkey, no. 44084/10
CtEDO 2026-02-13
0,87
MAKSYMYKHIN v. UKRAINE
Published on 2 March 2026 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 48673/19 Oleksandr Yevgeniyovych MAKSYMYKHIN against Ukraine lodged on 9 September 2019 communicated on 13 February 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a life prisoner sin
CtEDO 2024-10-10
0,87
NECHAYENKO v. UKRAINE
(contrast Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others, cited above, §§ 119 ‐ 28). 9. It is therefore unnecessary to examine whether the domestic law provides for a mechanism for overcoming these inconsistencies and whether that mechanism has be
Sursă