CtEDO 16.12.2021 RO

Decision Alves de Oliveira v. France - Combination of criminal sanctions and tax penalties to punish exploitation of prostitution and money laundering: application rejected

HOTĂRÂRE
16.12.2021
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2021
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Decision Alves de Oliveira v. France - Combination of criminal sanctions and tax penalties to punish exploitation of prostitution and money laundering: application rejected (CtEDO, 2021)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-11-09
0,87
OLIVEIRA ARCANJO v. PORTUGAL
that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application may be restored to the list in accordance with Article 37 § 2 of the Convention (see Josipović v. Serbia (dec.), no. 18369/07, 4 Marc
CtEDO 2021-12-08
0,87
CASE OF LE TIRILLY AND DORNIC AGAINST FRANCE AND 1 OTHER CASE
Resolution Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Two cases against France (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2021 at the 1420 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) Application No. Case Date of t
CtEDO 2021-05-20
0,87
ALVES SEQUEIRA v. PORTUGAL
to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached
CtEDO 2023-12-14
0,87
MARQUES DUARTE D'ALMEIDA v. PORTUGAL
Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application may be restored to the list in accordance with Article 37 § 2 of the Convention (see Josipović v. Serbi
CtEDO 2014-07-01
0,87
FERREIRA ALVES AND ALVES v. PORTUGAL
that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols. It follows that this part of the applications is also manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with
Sursă