ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 11.01.2022 RO

Judgment Ekimdzhiev and Others v. Bulgaria - Flaws in legal safeguards and oversight procedures around secret surveillance

HOTĂRÂRE
11.01.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Ekimdzhiev and Others v. Bulgaria - Flaws in legal safeguards and oversight procedures around secret surveillance (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2023-09-21
0,91
CASE OF ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND EKIMDZHIEV AGAINST BULGARIA
Having examined the information provided by the government, indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see
CtEDO 2022-05-25
0,90
GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA
Published on 13 June 2022 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 73086/12 Vasil Dimitrov GEORGIEV against Bulgaria lodged on 27 October 2012 communicated on 25 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant claims that the manner in which the us
CtEDO 2022-01-11
0,90
Ekimdzhiev et autres c. Bulgarie
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 34) Requêtes individuelles;(Art. 34) Victime;Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;V
CtEDO 2022-01-11
0,90
CASE OF EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA - [Bulgarian Translation] by the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violat
CtEDO 2022-05-25
0,89
STOYANOV AND TABAKOV v. BULGARIA
Published on 13 June 2022 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 30005/13 Valeri Stoyanov STOYANOV and Valentin Stoyanov TABAKOV against Bulgaria lodged on 13 April 2013 communicated on 25 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE Both applicants are law
Sursă