CtEDO 18.01.2022 RO

Judgment Atristain Gorosabel v. Spain - Lack of access to a lawyer of the applicant’s own choosing and inability to consult legal-aid lawyer during police questioning while in incommunicado detention

HOTĂRÂRE

18.01.2022

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Atristain Gorosabel v. Spain - Lack of access to a lawyer of the applicant’s own choosing and inability to consult legal-aid lawyer during police questioning while in incommunicado detention (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2017-04-05

0,92

ATRISTAIN GOROSABEL v. SPAIN

’ imprisonment. The sentence was upheld by the Supreme Court on 18 March 2014. On 7 May 2014 the applicant lodged an amparo appeal before the Constitutional Court. He argued that his right to be assisted by a lawyer of his own choosing had

CtEDO 2024-07-04

0,90

ATRISTAIN GOROSABEL v. SPAIN

interference with his family life, contrary to Articles 5, 3 and 8 of the Convention. Lastly, the applicant complained, also under Article 6 of the Convention, that there had been a lack of sufficient reasoning in the Constitutional Court’s

CtEDO 2017-02-09

0,88

GARCÍA ESPINAR v. SPAIN

Communicated on 9 February 2017 THIRD SECTION Application no. 6107/17 Javier GARCÍA ESPINAR against Spain lodged on 12 January 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s right of access to a court and to judici

CtEDO 2024-07-01

0,88

CASE OF ATRISTAIN GOROSABEL AGAINST SPAIN

Resolution CM/ResDH(2024)148 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Atristain Gorosabel against Spain (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 1 July 2024 at the 1503 rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) Applicat

CtEDO 2026-02-10

0,88

CASE OF SELAMI v. GREECE

reiterated the same objections regarding the availability of the interpreter to the applicant and his lawyer for the purpose of their communication during the one-hour suspension period. The applicant contested these arguments. 14. The Cour

Sursă