ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO
Sursă originală
CtEDO 18.01.2022 RO

Judgment Mehmet Ciftçi and Suat Incedere v. Turkey - Two prisoners punished for singing hymns and reading out poetry in prison

HOTĂRÂRE
18.01.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX
Citează această cauză 
Judgment Mehmet Ciftçi and Suat Incedere v. Turkey - Two prisoners punished for singing hymns and reading out poetry in prison (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-01-18
0,89
AFFAIRE MEHMET ÇİFTÇİ ET SUAT İNCEDERE c. TURQUIE
DEUXIÈME SECTION AFFAIRE MEHMET ÇİFTÇİ c. TURQUIE ET SUAT İNCEDERE c. TURQUIE (Requêtes n os 21266/19 et 21774/19) ARRÊT Art 10 • Liberté d’expression • Sanction disciplinaire de privation des moyens de communication pendant un mois infligé
CtEDO 2023-02-28
0,88
TEKMENÜRAY AND İNCEDERE v. TÜRKİYE
SECOND SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 35527/19 and 16853/20 Mehmet Şirin TEKMENÜRAY against Türkiye and Suat İNCEDERE against Türkiye The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 28 February 2023 as a Committee compos
CtEDO 2023-03-14
0,87
ÖZEN v. TÜRKİYE
has already examined similar complaints and set out the principles deriving from its case-law on freedom of expression in prisons in judgments against Türkiye, particularly in Günana and Others v. Turkey (nos. 70934/10 and 4 others, 20 Nove
CtEDO 2020-01-23
0,87
İNCEDERE c. TURQUIE
TION Requête n o 21774/19 Suat İNCEDERE contre la Turquie introduite le 4 April 2019 OBJET DE L’AFFAIRE La requête concerne la sanction de privation des moyens de communication pendant un mois infligée par l’administration pénitentiaire au
CtEDO 2018-06-19
0,87
CASE OF SARITAȘ AND GEYİK v. TURKEY
of Article 10 of the Convention (see, for example, Savgın v. Turkey, no. 13304/03, §§ 39-48, 2 February 2010; Gül and Others, cited above, §§ 32-45; Kılıç and Eren v. Turkey, no. 43807/07, §§ 20-31, 29 November 2011; Faruk Temel, cited abov
Sursă