CtEDO 25.01.2022 Auto

CASE OF İLKER DENIZ YÜCEL v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice

RESPONDENT
TUR
HOTĂRÂRE
25.01.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF İLKER DENIZ YÜCEL v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs; menținerea inadmisibilă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-3-a) Profundat în mod evident;Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (arestarea legală sau deținerea;art. 5-1-c - Suspiciune rezonabilă);Nici o încălcare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-4 - Garanții procedurale de reexaminare);Violare a articolului 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-5 - Compensare);Violare a articolului 10 - Libertatea de expresie - {generală} (art. 10-1 - Libertatea de exprimare); Prejudiciu moral - atribuire (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral;Darticolul)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-01-25
0,99
CASE OF İLKER DENIZ YÜCEL v. TURKEY - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Arti
CtEDO 2022-01-25
0,99
CASE OF İLKER DENİZ YÜCEL v. TURKEY
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Law
CtEDO 2022-05-31
0,97
CASE OF TANER KILIÇ v. TURKEY (No 2) - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Prelim
CtEDO 2023-01-31
0,97
CASE OF ABDULLAH KILIÇ v. TÜRKİYE - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c
CtEDO 2021-01-19
0,97
CASE OF ATILLA TAȘ v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 5 - Right to libe
Sursă