Judgment Negovanovic v. Serbia - Denying blind ch… · CtEDO 2022

CtEDO 2020-01-28

0,90

NEGOVANOVIĆ v. SERBIA and 3 other applications

3 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants are blind chess players who have won medals for Serbia internationally, including medals in competitions such as the Blind Chess Olympiad. They complain that

CtEDO 2022-10-04

0,88

CASE OF PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of

CtEDO 2022-10-04

0,88

Paketova and Others v. Bulgaria

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of

CtEDO 2021-05-11

0,88

Yocheva and Ganeva v. Bulgaria

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Final domestic decision;Violation of

CtEDO 2021-05-11

0,87

CASE OF YOCHEVA AND GANEVA v. BULGARIA

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;(Art. 35-1) Final domestic decision;Violation of

Judgment Negovanovic v. Serbia - Denying blind chess players benefits and awards for sporting merits was discriminatory

Grupate prin similitudine semantică