Interim measures in the case of Polish Supreme Court judge’s immunity

CtEDO 2025-03-25 0,89

the appointment process compromised the legitimacy of the Disciplinary Chamber to the extent that, following an inherently deficient procedure for judicial appointments, it lacked and continued to lack the attributes of a “tribunal” that wa

CtEDO 2022-09-30 0,88

his immunity was taken by a body that did not satisfy the requirements of an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law”. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Was Article 6 § 1 of the Convention under its civil or criminal head applicabl

CtEDO 2022-09-30 0,88

parties and the proper conduct of the proceedings before the Court, the respondent State should ensure that the proceedings concerning the lifting of the applicant’s judicial immunity, which are currently pending before the Disciplinary Cha

CtEDO 2023-10-18 0,88

that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic proceedings have been terminated; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment co

CtEDO 2022-05-23 0,88

Published on 13 June 2022 FIRST SECTION Application no. 48530/21 Jacek KASZYŃSKI against Poland lodged on 27 September 2021 communicated on 23 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant was a judge at the Bydgoszcz District Court who