CtEDO 22.02.2022 Auto

CASE OF SHIRKHANYAN v. ARMENIA - [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia

RESPONDENT
ARM
HOTĂRÂRE
22.02.2022
Pe scurt
Instanță
CtEDO
Concluzie
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
CASE OF SHIRKHANYAN v. ARMENIA - [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia (CtEDO, 2022)
HUDOC · oficial

Obiecția preliminară aderată la fonduri și respinsă (art. 35) Criterii de admisibilitate;(Art. 35-1) Epuizarea căilor interne de recurs;Încălcarea articoluluiui 13+3 - Dreptul la un remediu eficace (art. 13 - Remediul eficace) (art. 3 - Tratament degradant);Încălcarea articoluluiui 3 - Interzicerea torturii (art. 3 - Tratament degradant) (aspect substanțial);Încălcarea articoluluiui 5 - Dreptul la libertate și securitate (art. 5-3 - Raționalitatea de detenție prealabilă);Încălcarea articoluluiui 34 - Aplicații individuale (art. 34 - Interzicerea exercitării dreptului la cerere);Nu are încălcarea art. 34 - Aplicații individuale (art. 34 - Incalcarea exercitării dreptului la cerere); prejudiciu moral (art. 41 - Prejudiciu moral)

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-02-22
1,00
CASE OF SHIRKHANYAN v. ARMENIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibit
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,97
CASE OF VARDANYAN AND KHALAFYAN v. ARMENIA – [Armenian translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2
CtEDO 2022-11-08
0,96
CASE OF VARDANYAN AND KHALAFYAN v. ARMENIA
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2
CtEDO 2020-10-08
0,96
CASE OF JHANGIRYAN v. ARMENIA – [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 -
CtEDO 2022-04-05
0,96
CASE OF NANA MURADYAN v. ARMENIA - [Armenian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Armenia
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismi
Sursă