ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 08.03.2022 RO

Judgment Tonkov v. Belgium - restrictions on access to a lawyer in the initial stages of criminal proceedings

HOTĂRÂRE

08.03.2022

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Tonkov v. Belgium - restrictions on access to a lawyer in the initial stages of criminal proceedings (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2015-12-10

CASE OF TIKHONOV v. UKRAINE

ting statements made by the applicant and the absence of the lawyer at that time had not affected the overall fairness of the proceedings. They argued that the applicant had voluntarily confessed to the murder and that his privilege against

CtEDO 2022-10-04

JANKOVIĆ v. SLOVENIA

the Commission’s conclusions had been limited in scope and that he therefore had no access to court in the matter. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Was Article 6 § 1 of the Convention under its civil or criminal head applicable to the proceedings i

CtEDO 2022-09-22

CASE OF VERBAUWHEDE AND PARTI DU TRAVAIL DE BELGIQUE AGAINST BELGIUM

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)184 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Michael Verbauwhede and Parti du Travail de Belgique against Belgium (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 September 2022 at the 1443 rd mee

CtEDO 2021-04-06

Venken and Others v. Belgium

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading

CtEDO 2022-04-08

RASHID v. BULGARIA

been the proceeds of crime. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1. Was the applicant unjustifiably deprived of the right to access to a court, as guaranteed under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, seeing that he was unable to have his appeal against th

Sursă