Judgment L.F. v. Hungary - no legal basis for inspection of Roma family’s home

CtEDO 2017-07-13 0,88

for his home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2. In particular, has there been a violation of the respondent State’s positive obligation under the same provision on account of the authorities’ alleged failure to take all reasonable

CtEDO 2022-12-14 0,87

awarded by the Court; Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic proceedings have been terminated; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings foun

CtEDO 2020-05-26 0,87

No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (Azerbaijan);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect) (Azerbaijan);No violation of Article 2 - Right to

CtEDO 2022-06-30 0,87

resolved given that the applicants are no longer detained on remand; Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framewor