ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 07.06.2022 RO

Judgment Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia - Multiple violations in case brought by Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia

HOTĂRÂRE

07.06.2022

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX

Citează această cauză

Judgment Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia - Multiple violations in case brought by Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2025-03-06

CASE OF LOGINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

68 ‐ 73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 9 of the Convention 7. The applicants complained principally of their criminal prosecution as members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses religious organisation. They relied on Article 9 of the

CtEDO 2025-07-10

CASE OF KIROV LRO AND DMITRIYEVYKH v. RUSSIA

present application (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68 ‐ 73, 17 January 2023). partial strike out 7. In so far as the application was lodged by the Kirov local religious organisation of Jehovah’s Witn

CtEDO 2025-10-16

CASE OF MARKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

relied on Article 9 of the Convention. 11. The Court observes that in the leading case of Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia, nos. 32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 256-73, 7 June 2022, it has already found a violation of Article 9 of the Conventio

CtEDO 2025-03-06

CASE OF LUBIN AND ISAKOV v. RUSSIA

application (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68 ‐ 73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 9 of the Convention 7. The applicants complained principally of their prosecution on charges of extr

CtEDO 2025-05-15

CASE OF KLIMOV v. RUSSIA

to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68 ‐ 73, 17 January 2023). ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 9 of

Sursă