ÎNAPOI LA REZULTATE CtEDO

Sursă originală

CtEDO 07.06.2022 RO

Judgment Teliatnikov v. Lithuania - Jehovah’s Witness should have had a clear alternative to military service

HOTĂRÂRE

07.06.2022

RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro

Citează această cauză

Judgment Teliatnikov v. Lithuania - Jehovah’s Witness should have had a clear alternative to military service (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze

CtEDO 2022-12-14

RUTKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA

March 2020 communicated on 14 December 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a Jehovah’s Witness, he is also a religious minister. Having been called on to perform military service in Lithuania, he refused on religious and consci

CtEDO 2020-05-18

TELIATNIKOV v. LITHUANIA

Communicated on 18 May 2020 Published on 8 June 2020 SECOND SECTION Application no. 51914/19 Stanislav TELIATNIKOV against Lithuania lodged on 1 October 2019 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Stanislav Teliatnikov, is a Lithuanian nation

CtEDO 2025-08-26

CASE OF RUTKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA

an service. The Court found in this context the existing alternative national defence service to be intrinsically linked to military service and therefore considered that it could not be seen as a separate civilian service. Accordingly, the

CtEDO 2022-09-22

CASE OF RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF KRYVYI RIH'S TERNIVSKY DISTRICT AGAINST UKRAINE

-mentioned obligation; Having examined the action report provided by the government, indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by

CtEDO 2021-08-23

VLADIMIROV v. RUSSIA

of the applicant’s freedom of thought or religion, contrary to Article 9 of the Convention? Did the military authorities and the domestic courts give due consideration to the applicant’s convictions? Did they rely on relevant and sufficient

Sursă