CtEDO 14.06.2022 RO

Judgment Ponta v. Romania - Ex-politician’s freedom of expression violated by award of damages for post on his Facebook page

HOTĂRÂRE
14.06.2022
RĂSFOIEȘTE: CtEDO · 2022
DESCARCĂ: PDF · DOCX 🔒 Pro
Citează această cauză
Judgment Ponta v. Romania - Ex-politician’s freedom of expression violated by award of damages for post on his Facebook page (CtEDO, 2022)

Textul complet nu este disponibil. Consultați sursa originală.

§ Cauze similare

Grupate prin similitudine semantică

5 cauze
CtEDO 2022-06-20
0,89
GOSPOČIĆ v. CROATIA and 1 other application
instituted civil proceedings against her for those same statements and by a final judgment of 3 March 2020, the applicant was ordered to pay them damages in the amount of HRK 6,000 (approximately EUR 800). The applicant complains under Arti
CtEDO 2025-05-28
0,89
PAUČINAC v. SERBIA
M. and costs of the proceedings. While invoking Articles 6 and 10 of the Convention, the applicant essentially complains that the above criminal conviction violated his right to freedom of expression. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been
CtEDO 2013-01-08
0,88
Bucur and Toma v. Romania
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case and friendly settlement proceedings;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 6 - Right to
CtEDO 2019-01-08
0,88
CASE OF PRUNEA v. ROMANIA
see paragraph 10 of the judgment). Moreover, the Court has also held that in the field of political debate, political invective often spills over into the personal sphere; such are the hazards of politics and the free debate of ideas, which
CtEDO 2023-01-24
0,88
CASE OF SVETOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of
Sursă